Packageactivev0.2.0

io.github.nickjlamb/studydiff

Explain why two scientific papers disagree, every claim grounded in a verbatim source quote.

Auth

API key

Data

Handles secrets

License

MIT

Unknown facts are omitted here and listed as pending in the profile.

Trust verdict

No blockers found

No blockers found across the assessed dimensions.

assessed on 3 of 4 dimensions · 1 not applicable

MaintenanceActively maintained — last activity 1 days ago.GitHub · as of Jul 14, 2026
Pass
ProvenanceOrigin linked to a public source repository.Official MCP Registry · as of Jul 13, 2026
Pass
Supply chainNo known vulnerabilities in scanned package dependencies (OSV).OSV (Google Open Source Vulnerabilities) · as of Jul 14, 2026
Pass
Manifest integrity

Profile

What this server is — descriptive, not a rating. The verdict above judges it; this describes it.

Classification

CapabilityPending — classifier not yet run

IndustryPending — classifier not yet run

Exposure

Side effectsPending — tools not yet classified

Auth modelAPI keymcp_registry

Data surfaceHandles secretsmcp_registry

Geography

Hosting

Tool surface

Not yet probed — this server's live tool surface hasn't been captured yet, so its tools and measurements aren't available.

Adoption

maintainer

Not attested

build provenance

Connect

npm package · v0.2.0 · stdio

npx -y studydiff-mcp

ANTHROPIC_API_KEYsecret
Anthropic API key, used only by compare_studies for live papers. compare_example and list_examples run offline without it.
NCBI_EMAIL
Contact email sent with PubMed/PMC E-utilities requests (NCBI asks callers to identify themselves). Optional.

Sources

Every verdict and label is attributable to its source and recomputed from our own landed copy, never read live on this page.